Who is better, Nicklaus or Macfarlane?
Jack Nicklaus leads with a GOAT score of 95.0 against 75.7 for Willie Macfarlane — a gap of 19.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jack Nicklaus above Willie Macfarlane: 95.0 vs 75.7. Jack Nicklaus leads on Honours, Dominance, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Nicklaus wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Macfarlane wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/jack-nicklaus-vs-willie-macfarlane
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Nicklaus leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 22
No verified birth date for Macfarlane — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 22, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | NicklausRetired | MacfarlaneRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major championships | 18 | — |
| PGA Tour wins | 73 | 7 |
| Weeks at world No. 1 | 0 | — |
| Player of the Year awards | 5 | — |
| Career prize money (M$) | 5.7 | — |
| Major runner-up finishes | 19 | — |
| Major titles | — | 1 |
| US Open top-tens | — | 5 |
| Career span in years | — | 22 |
| Metropolitan Open titles | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 94 | 64 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 99 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 99 | 68 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 78 |
Jack Nicklaus leads with a GOAT score of 95.0 against 75.7 for Willie Macfarlane — a gap of 19.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Macfarlane does not lead any of the five categories; Nicklaus is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Nicklaus: 95.0, Macfarlane: 75.7.
Make your case for Nicklaus vs Macfarlane. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.