Who is better, Anderson or Bradley?
Jamie Anderson leads with a GOAT score of 86.3 against 86.1 for Pat Bradley — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jamie Anderson above Pat Bradley: 86.3 vs 86.1. Jamie Anderson leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Pat Bradley leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Anderson wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Bradley wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/jamie-anderson-golf-vs-pat-bradley
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Anderson leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Anderson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 13 |
| 🇺🇸 Bradley | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 15 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AndersonRetired | BradleyRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Open Championships | 3 | — |
| Consecutive Open wins | 3 | — |
| Open top-five finishes | 9 | — |
| Career years | 17 | — |
| Open runner-up finishes | 1 | — |
| Major titles | — | 6 |
| LPGA wins | — | 31 |
| Player of the Year awards | — | 1 |
| Vare Trophy wins | — | 1 |
| Solheim Cup appearances | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 86 |
Jamie Anderson leads with a GOAT score of 86.3 against 86.1 for Pat Bradley — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Bradley scores higher on honours, longevity. Anderson leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Anderson: 86.3, Bradley: 86.1.
Make your case for Anderson vs Bradley. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.