Who is better, Saive or Mizutani?
Jean-Michel Saive leads with a GOAT score of 85.0 against 84.9 for Jun Mizutani — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jean-Michel Saive above Jun Mizutani: 85.0 vs 84.9. Jean-Michel Saive leads on Longevity. Jun Mizutani leads on Statistics, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Saive wins: Longevity
Mizutani wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/jean-michel-saive-vs-jun-mizutani
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Saive leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇪 Saive | 0 | 0 | 48 | 104 | 320 | 690 |
| 🇯🇵 Mizutani | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 65 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SaiveRetired | MizutaniRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship medals | 1 | — |
| European titles | 2 | — |
| Weeks at world number one | 20 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 7 | — |
| Years at the top level | 29 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 1 |
| Olympic medals | — | 3 |
| Japan national titles | — | 10 |
| World Tour titles | — | 8 |
| Career-high world ranking | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 94 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 86 |
Jean-Michel Saive leads with a GOAT score of 85.0 against 84.9 for Jun Mizutani — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Mizutani scores higher on dominance, honours, statistics. Saive leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Saive: 85.0, Mizutani: 84.9.
Make your case for Saive vs Mizutani. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.