Who is better, Saive or Li?
Li Jie leads with a GOAT score of 85.2 against 85.0 for Jean-Michel Saive — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Li Jie above Jean-Michel Saive: 85.2 vs 85.0. Li Jie leads on Statistics, Dominance, Honours. Jean-Michel Saive leads on Longevity, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Li wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Saive wins: Peak, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/jean-michel-saive-vs-li-jie-tabletennis
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Li leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇪 Saive | 0 | 0 | 48 | 104 | 320 | 690 |
| 🇳🇱 Li | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 222 | 580 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SaiveRetired | LiRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship medals | 1 | — |
| European titles | 2 | — |
| Weeks at world number one | 20 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 7 | — |
| Years at the top level | 29 | — |
| European Games gold medals | — | 1 |
| European Championship medals | — | 3 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 3 |
| Dutch titles | — | 8 |
| World Championship appearances | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 94 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 88 |
Li Jie leads with a GOAT score of 85.2 against 85.0 for Jean-Michel Saive — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Saive scores higher on peak, longevity. Li leads on dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Saive: 85.0, Li: 85.2.
Make your case for Saive vs Li. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.