GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Saive vs Li

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
LiWinner
85.2

Li wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics

Saive
85.0

Saive wins: Peak, Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/jean-michel-saive-vs-li-jie-tabletennis

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇳🇱 Li Jie
85.2

Li leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. European Games champion and a long-serving Dutch number one.

1. Li Jie
85.2
2. Jean-Michel Saive
85.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇧🇪 Jean-Michel Saive5 seasons played · career day 1,825320 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇳🇱 Li Jie5 seasons played · career day 1,826286 titles
-10.6% vs Saive at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇧🇪 Saive0048104320690
🇳🇱 Li0050104222580

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricSaiveRetiredLiRetired
World Championship medals1
European titles2
Weeks at world number one20
Olympic Games contested7
Years at the top level29
European Games gold medals1
European Championship medals3
Olympic appearances3
Dutch titles8
World Championship appearances8
Dominance w25%7880
Peak w20%9088
Longevity w20%9488
Honours w20%8284
Statistics w15%8288

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Li85.2
Saive85.0
The people
Saive
Li

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Saive vs Li. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →