Who is better, Parnevik or Thompson?
Lexi Thompson leads with a GOAT score of 66.4 against 55.3 for Jesper Parnevik — a gap of 11.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Lexi Thompson above Jesper Parnevik: 66.4 vs 55.3. Lexi Thompson leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Thompson wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Parnevik wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/jesper-parnevik-vs-lexi-thompson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Thompson leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Parnevik | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 🇺🇸 Thompson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 9 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ParnevikRetired | ThompsonActive |
|---|---|---|
| PGA Tour wins | 5 | — |
| European Tour wins | 6 | — |
| Ryder Cup appearances | 3 | — |
| Major runner-up finishes | 2 | — |
| Career worldwide wins | 11 | — |
| Major titles | — | 1 |
| LPGA Tour wins | — | 11 |
| Solheim Cup appearances | — | 6 |
| Career top-10 finishes | — | 100 |
| Ladies European Tour wins | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 50 | 62 |
| Peak w20% | 62 | 74 |
| Longevity w20% | 62 | 70 |
| Honours w20% | 48 | 58 |
| Statistics w15% | 56 | 70 |
Lexi Thompson leads with a GOAT score of 66.4 against 55.3 for Jesper Parnevik — a gap of 11.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Parnevik does not lead any of the five categories; Thompson is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Parnevik: 55.3, Thompson: 66.4.
Make your case for Parnevik vs Thompson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.