GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Jiang vs Boroš

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
JiangWinner
84.5

Jiang wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Boroš
84.5

Boroš wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/jiang-jialiang-vs-tamara-boros

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇳 Jiang Jialiang
84.5

Jiang leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. World singles champion in 1985 and 1987 at the height of China's dominance.

1. Jiang Jialiang
84.5
2. Tamara Boroš
84.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇨🇳 Jiang Jialiang5 seasons played · career day 1,825422 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇭🇷 Tamara Boroš5 seasons played · career day 1,825275 titles
-34.8% vs Jiang at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇳 Jiang0064142422720
🇭🇷 Boroš004595275585

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricJiangRetiredBorošRetired
World Championship singles titles2
World team titles3
World Cup medals2
Asian Championship titles2
Years at the top level9
European Championship medals5
World Championship medals1
World ranking peak5
Pro Tour titles4
Croatian titles8
Dominance w25%8880
Peak w20%9490
Longevity w20%6686
Honours w20%8882
Statistics w15%8686

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Jiang84.5
Boroš84.5
The people
Jiang
Boroš

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Jiang vs Boroš. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →