GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Barnes vs Mickelson

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BarnesWinner
86.1

Barnes wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Mickelson
85.8

Mickelson wins: Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Golf

Shareable URL · /compare/jim-barnes-vs-phil-mickelson

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Jim Barnes
86.1

Barnes leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Won the first two PGA Championships plus the US Open and the Open Championship.

1. Jim Barnes
86.1
2. Phil Mickelson
85.8

Category breakdown

Season form · Wins per season

Career timeline · Wins per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Wins per season
1. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Jim Barnes5 seasons played · career day 1,826222 wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Phil Mickelson5 seasons played · career day 2,1919 wins
-95.9% vs Barnes at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Barnes003067163530
🇺🇸 Mickelson0001414

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricBarnesRetiredMickelsonActive
Major titles46
PGA Championships22
Western Open titles1
Professional wins21
US Open winning margin9
PGA Tour wins45
Masters titles3
Ryder Cup appearances12
Weeks in top 10700
Dominance w25%8682
Peak w20%9286
Longevity w20%8092
Honours w20%8884
Statistics w15%8486

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Barnes86.1
Mickelson85.8
The people
Barnes
Mickelson

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Barnes vs Mickelson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →