Who is better, Barnes or Mickelson?
Jim Barnes leads with a GOAT score of 86.1 against 85.8 for Phil Mickelson — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jim Barnes above Phil Mickelson: 86.1 vs 85.8. Jim Barnes leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours. Phil Mickelson leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Barnes wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Mickelson wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/jim-barnes-vs-phil-mickelson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Barnes leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Barnes | 0 | 0 | 30 | 67 | 163 | 530 |
| 🇺🇸 Mickelson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 14 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Jim Barnes leads with a GOAT score of 86.1 against 85.8 for Phil Mickelson — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Mickelson scores higher on statistics, longevity. Barnes leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Barnes: 86.1, Mickelson: 85.8.
Make your case for Barnes vs Mickelson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.