Who is better, Barnes or Haynie?
Jim Barnes leads with a GOAT score of 86.1 against 86.0 for Sandra Haynie — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Barnes vs Haynie
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jim Barnes above Sandra Haynie: 86.1 vs 86.0. Jim Barnes leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Sandra Haynie leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BarnesWinner
86.1Barnes wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Haynie
86.0Haynie wins: Longevity, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to GolfShareable URL · /compare/jim-barnes-vs-sandra-haynie
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🏴 Jim Barnes
86.1
Barnes leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Jim Barnes
2. Sandra Haynie
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🏴 Jim Barnes5 seasons played · career day 1,826222 wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Sandra Haynie5 seasons played · career day 2,19012 wins
-94.6% vs Barnes at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Barnes | 0 | 0 | 30 | 67 | 163 | 530 |
| 🇺🇸 Haynie | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 22 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Barnes86.1
Haynie86.0
FAQ
Where does Haynie beat Barnes?
Haynie scores higher on statistics, longevity. Barnes leads on peak, dominance, honours.
How is the Barnes vs Haynie score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Barnes: 86.1, Haynie: 86.0.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Barnes vs Haynie. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.