Who is better, Haeggman or Højgaard?
Joakim Haeggman leads with a GOAT score of 78.5 against 78.5 for Nicolai Højgaard — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Joakim Haeggman and Nicolai Højgaard level at 78.5. Joakim Haeggman leads on Longevity. Nicolai Højgaard leads on Dominance, Statistics, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Haeggman wins: Longevity
Højgaard wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/joakim-haeggman-vs-nicolai-hojgaard
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Haeggman leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Haeggman | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| 🇩🇰 Højgaard | 0 | 0 | 0 | 220 | 505 | 685 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HaeggmanRetired | HøjgaardActive |
|---|---|---|
| European Tour wins | 3 | — |
| Ryder Cup appearances | 1 | — |
| Seasons on the European Tour | 25 | — |
| Challenge Tour wins | 2 | — |
| Career best European ranking | 12 | — |
| DP World Tour wins | — | 3 |
| Ryder Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Highest world ranking | — | 40 |
| Major top-25 finishes | — | 3 |
| Professional years | — | 7 |
| Dominance w25% | 68 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 68 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 88 |
Joakim Haeggman leads with a GOAT score of 78.5 against 78.5 for Nicolai Højgaard — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Højgaard scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Haeggman leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Haeggman: 78.5, Højgaard: 78.5.
Make your case for Haeggman vs Højgaard. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.