Who is better, Niemann or Harrington?
Joaquín Niemann leads with a GOAT score of 74.8 against 74.6 for Pádraig Harrington — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Joaquín Niemann above Pádraig Harrington: 74.8 vs 74.6. Joaquín Niemann leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak. Pádraig Harrington leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Niemann wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Harrington wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/joaquin-niemann-vs-padraig-harrington
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Niemann leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇱 Niemann | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 10 |
| 🇮🇪 Harrington | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 9 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | NiemannActive | HarringtonActive |
|---|---|---|
| PGA Tour wins | 2 | 6 |
| LIV Golf wins | 7 | — |
| Presidents Cup appearances | 3 | — |
| Career-high world ranking | 15 | — |
| Professional wins | 11 | — |
| Major titles | — | 3 |
| European Tour wins | — | 15 |
| Ryder Cup appearances | — | 6 |
| Senior major titles | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 68 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 80 |
| Longevity w20% | 62 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 72 |
Joaquín Niemann leads with a GOAT score of 74.8 against 74.6 for Pádraig Harrington — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Harrington scores higher on honours, longevity. Niemann leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Niemann: 74.8, Harrington: 74.6.
Make your case for Niemann vs Harrington. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.