Who is better, Lloyd or Højgaard?
Joe Lloyd leads with a GOAT score of 76.9 against 76.8 for Rasmus Højgaard — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Joe Lloyd above Rasmus Højgaard: 76.9 vs 76.8. Joe Lloyd leads on Longevity, Peak. Rasmus Højgaard leads on Statistics, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Lloyd wins: Peak, Longevity
Højgaard wins: Dominance, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/joe-lloyd-vs-rasmus-hojgaard
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Lloyd leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Lloyd | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 24 | 72 |
| 🇩🇰 Højgaard | 0 | 0 | 0 | 250 | 565 | 724 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | LloydRetired | HøjgaardActive |
|---|---|---|
| US Open titles | 1 | — |
| US Open top-ten finishes | 3 | — |
| Career years | 17 | — |
| Winning margin in 1897 (strokes) | 1 | — |
| Club professional posts | 2 | — |
| DP World Tour wins | — | 4 |
| Wins before age 24 | — | 4 |
| Highest world ranking | — | 44 |
| Ryder Cup appearances | — | 1 |
| Professional years | — | 7 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 68 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 88 |
Joe Lloyd leads with a GOAT score of 76.9 against 76.8 for Rasmus Højgaard — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Højgaard scores higher on dominance, statistics. Lloyd leads on peak, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Lloyd: 76.9, Højgaard: 76.8.
Make your case for Lloyd vs Højgaard. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.