Who is better, McDermott or Immelman?
John McDermott leads with a GOAT score of 78.3 against 78.2 for Trevor Immelman — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
McDermott vs Immelman
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks John McDermott above Trevor Immelman: 78.3 vs 78.2. John McDermott leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak. Trevor Immelman leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
McDermottWinner
78.3McDermott wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Immelman
78.2Immelman wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to GolfShareable URL · /compare/john-mcdermott-vs-trevor-immelman
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 John McDermott
78.3
McDermott leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. John McDermott
2. Trevor Immelman
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 John McDermott5 seasons played · career day 2,55611 wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇿🇦 Trevor Immelman5 seasons played · career day 3,2866 wins
-45.5% vs McDermott at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 McDermott | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 12 |
| 🇿🇦 Immelman | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | McDermottRetired | ImmelmanRetired |
|---|---|---|
| US Open titles | 2 | — |
| Professional wins | 8 | — |
| Youngest US Open winner age | 19 | — |
| US Open top-fives | 4 | — |
| Career span in years | 9 | — |
| Major titles | — | 1 |
| European Tour wins | — | 4 |
| PGA Tour wins | — | 2 |
| Presidents Cup appearances | — | 2 |
| Career-high world ranking | — | 15 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 70 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 56 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 82 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
McDermott78.3
Immelman78.2
FAQ
Where does Immelman beat McDermott?
Immelman scores higher on longevity. McDermott leads on peak, dominance, honours.
How is the McDermott vs Immelman score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. McDermott: 78.3, Immelman: 78.2.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for McDermott vs Immelman. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.