Who is better, Boros or Anderson?
Willie Anderson leads with a GOAT score of 85.5 against 85.4 for Julius Boros — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Willie Anderson above Julius Boros: 85.5 vs 85.4. Willie Anderson leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Julius Boros leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Anderson wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Boros wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/julius-boros-vs-willie-anderson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Anderson leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Boros | 0 | 0 | 25 | 55 | 173 | 398 |
| 🏴 Anderson | 0 | 0 | 40 | 88 | 280 | 711 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BorosRetired | AndersonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 3 | — |
| PGA Tour wins | 18 | — |
| PGA Player of the Year awards | 2 | — |
| Ryder Cup appearances | 4 | — |
| Age at final major win | 48 | — |
| US Open titles | — | 4 |
| Consecutive US Open titles | — | 3 |
| Western Open titles | — | 4 |
| Professional wins | — | 11 |
| Top-5 US Open finishes | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 92 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 66 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 86 |
Willie Anderson leads with a GOAT score of 85.5 against 85.4 for Julius Boros — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Boros scores higher on longevity. Anderson leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Boros: 85.4, Anderson: 85.5.
Make your case for Boros vs Anderson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.