Who is better, Mizutani or Primorac?
Zoran Primorac leads with a GOAT score of 85.0 against 84.9 for Jun Mizutani — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Zoran Primorac above Jun Mizutani: 85.0 vs 84.9. Zoran Primorac leads on Longevity. Jun Mizutani leads on Statistics, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Primorac wins: Longevity
Mizutani wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/jun-mizutani-vs-zoran-primorac
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Primorac leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇯🇵 Mizutani | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 65 |
| 🇭🇷 Primorac | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 330 | 696 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MizutaniRetired | PrimoracRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| Olympic medals | 3 | — |
| Japan national titles | 10 | — |
| World Tour titles | 8 | — |
| Career-high world ranking | 4 | — |
| World Cup titles | — | 2 |
| World Championship medals | — | 2 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 7 |
| European medals | — | 4 |
| Years at the top level | — | 28 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 94 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 82 |
Zoran Primorac leads with a GOAT score of 85.0 against 84.9 for Jun Mizutani — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Mizutani scores higher on dominance, honours, statistics. Primorac leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Mizutani: 84.9, Primorac: 85.0.
Make your case for Mizutani vs Primorac. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.