GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Ishikawa vs Kim T.

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

Quick answer

GOAT Rank currently ranks Kim Taek-soo above Kasumi Ishikawa: 82.7 vs 82.6. Kim Taek-soo leads on Dominance, Peak. Kasumi Ishikawa leads on Longevity, Honours.

How the GOAT Score is calculated →
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
Kim T.Winner
82.7

Kim T. wins: Dominance, Peak

Ishikawa
82.6

Ishikawa wins: Longevity, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/kasumi-ishikawa-vs-kim-taek-soo

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇰🇷 Kim Taek-soo
82.7

Kim T. leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.

1. Kim Taek-soo
82.7
2. Kasumi Ishikawa
82.6

Category breakdown

Season form · Form index per season

Career timeline · Form index per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Form index per season
1. 🇰🇷 Kim Taek-soo5 seasons played · career day 1,826369 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇯🇵 Kasumi Ishikawa5 seasons played · career day 1,826354 titles
-4.1% vs Kim T. at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇯🇵 Ishikawa0052114266720
🇰🇷 Kim T.0055119277729

Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.

MetricIshikawaRetiredKim T.Retired
Olympic medals33
Japanese national titles9—
World Championship medals44
Career high world ranking32
Years at the top level1617
Asian Games golds—3
Dominance w25%7678
Peak w20%8688
Longevity w20%8886
Honours w20%8482
Statistics w15%8080

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Kim T.82.7
Ishikawa82.6
The people
Ishikawa
Kim T.

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

FAQ

Who is better, Ishikawa or Kim T.?

Kim Taek-soo leads with a GOAT score of 82.7 against 82.6 for Kasumi Ishikawa — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.

Where does Ishikawa beat Kim T.?

Ishikawa scores higher on honours, longevity. Kim T. leads on peak, dominance.

How is the Ishikawa vs Kim T. score calculated?

Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ishikawa: 82.6, Kim T.: 82.7.

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Ishikawa vs Kim T.. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →