Who is better, Kim or Barnes?
Kim Kyung-ah leads with a GOAT score of 83.6 against 83.6 for Pinkie Barnes — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Kim Kyung-ah and Pinkie Barnes level at 83.6. Kim Kyung-ah leads on Longevity. Pinkie Barnes leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kim wins: Longevity
Barnes wins: Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/kim-kyung-ah-vs-pinkie-barnes
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kim leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇷 Kim | 0 | 0 | 45 | 95 | 275 | 582 |
| 🇬🇧 Barnes | 0 | 0 | 50 | 109 | 336 | 686 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KimRetired | BarnesRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| Asian Games medals | 3 | — |
| World Championship medals | 3 | 3 |
| Pro Tour titles | 5 | — |
| World ranking peak | 5 | — |
| English titles | — | 4 |
| World Championship appearances | — | 8 |
| Corbillon Cup appearances | — | 6 |
| Seasons on the national team | — | 18 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 86 |
Kim Kyung-ah leads with a GOAT score of 83.6 against 83.6 for Pinkie Barnes — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Barnes scores higher on honours. Kim leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kim: 83.6, Barnes: 83.6.
Make your case for Kim vs Barnes. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.