Who is better, Kim T. or Lin S.?
Kim Taek-soo leads with a GOAT score of 82.7 against 82.7 for Lin Shidong — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Kim Taek-soo and Lin Shidong level at 82.7. Kim Taek-soo leads on Longevity. Lin Shidong leads on Dominance, Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kim T. wins: Longevity
Lin S. wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/kim-taek-soo-vs-lin-shidong
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kim T. leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇷 Kim T. | 0 | 0 | 55 | 119 | 277 | 729 |
| 🇨🇳 Lin S. | 0 | 0 | 62 | 142 | 330 | 330 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Kim T.Retired | Lin S.Active |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 3 | — |
| World Championship medals | 4 | — |
| Asian Games golds | 3 | — |
| Career high world ranking | 2 | — |
| Years at the top level | 17 | — |
| World Championship singles titles | — | 1 |
| WTT Grand Smash titles | — | 3 |
| Weeks at world number one | — | 60 |
| World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Seasons on the pro tour | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 62 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 88 |
Kim Taek-soo leads with a GOAT score of 82.7 against 82.7 for Lin Shidong — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Lin S. scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Kim T. leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kim T.: 82.7, Lin S.: 82.7.
Make your case for Kim T. vs Lin S.. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.