Who is better, Auchterlonie or Diegel?
Laurie Auchterlonie leads with a GOAT score of 81.4 against 81.4 for Leo Diegel — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Laurie Auchterlonie and Leo Diegel level at 81.4. Laurie Auchterlonie leads on Statistics, Peak. Leo Diegel leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Auchterlonie wins: Peak, Statistics
Diegel wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/laurie-auchterlonie-vs-leo-diegel
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Auchterlonie leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Auchterlonie | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 61 |
| 🇺🇸 Diegel | 0 | 0 | 25 | 57 | 144 | 493 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AuchterlonieRetired | DiegelRetired |
|---|---|---|
| US Open titles | 1 | — |
| First to break 80 in all four US Open rounds | 1 | — |
| US Open top-ten finishes | 5 | — |
| Career years | 19 | — |
| Winning margin in 1902 (strokes) | 6 | — |
| Major titles | — | 2 |
| PGA Tour wins | — | 30 |
| Canadian Open titles | — | 4 |
| Ryder Cup appearances | — | 4 |
| Top-10 major finishes | — | 15 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 82 |
Laurie Auchterlonie leads with a GOAT score of 81.4 against 81.4 for Leo Diegel — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Diegel scores higher on dominance, honours. Auchterlonie leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Auchterlonie: 81.4, Diegel: 81.4.
Make your case for Auchterlonie vs Diegel. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.