GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Little vs Elkington

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
LittleWinner
82.1

Little wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Elkington
81.9

Elkington wins: Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Golf

Shareable URL · /compare/lawson-little-vs-steve-elkington

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Lawson Little
82.1

Little leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Won the US and British Amateur double twice before the 1940 US Open.

1. Lawson Little
82.1
2. Steve Elkington
81.9

Category breakdown

Season form · Wins per season

Career timeline · Wins per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Wins per season
1. 🇺🇸 Lawson Little5 seasons played · career day 1,825295 wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇦🇺 Steve Elkington5 seasons played · career day 3,6515 wins
-98.3% vs Little at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Little003582295649
🇦🇺 Elkington000004

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricLittleRetiredElkingtonRetired
US Open titles1
Amateur Championships2
US Amateur titles2
PGA Tour wins810
Consecutive amateur match wins31
Major titles1
Players Championship wins2
Presidents Cup appearances5
Career-high world ranking4
Dominance w25%8274
Peak w20%9290
Longevity w20%7486
Honours w20%8278
Statistics w15%8084

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Little82.1
Elkington81.9
The people
Little
Elkington

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Little vs Elkington. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →