Who is better, Diegel or Hanson?
Leo Diegel leads with a GOAT score of 81.4 against 81.2 for Peter Hanson — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Leo Diegel above Peter Hanson: 81.4 vs 81.2. Leo Diegel leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Peter Hanson leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Diegel wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Hanson wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/leo-diegel-vs-peter-hanson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Diegel leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Diegel | 0 | 0 | 25 | 57 | 144 | 493 |
| 🇸🇪 Hanson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 430 | 700 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | DiegelRetired | HansonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 2 | — |
| PGA Tour wins | 30 | — |
| Canadian Open titles | 4 | — |
| Ryder Cup appearances | 4 | — |
| Top-10 major finishes | 15 | — |
| European Tour wins | — | 5 |
| Ryder Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Masters top-five finishes | — | 1 |
| Highest world ranking | — | 21 |
| Professional years | — | 21 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 88 |
Leo Diegel leads with a GOAT score of 81.4 against 81.2 for Peter Hanson — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hanson scores higher on statistics, longevity. Diegel leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Diegel: 81.4, Hanson: 81.2.
Make your case for Diegel vs Hanson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.