Who is better, Diegel or Ryu?
Leo Diegel leads with a GOAT score of 81.4 against 81.2 for So Yeon Ryu — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Diegel vs Ryu
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Leo Diegel above So Yeon Ryu: 81.4 vs 81.2. Leo Diegel leads on Dominance, Peak. So Yeon Ryu leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
DiegelWinner
81.4Diegel wins: Dominance, Peak
Ryu
81.2Ryu wins: Longevity, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to GolfShareable URL · /compare/leo-diegel-vs-so-yeon-ryu
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Leo Diegel
81.4
Diegel leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Leo Diegel
2. So Yeon Ryu
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Leo Diegel5 seasons played · career day 1,826199 wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇰🇷 So Yeon Ryu5 seasons played · career day 2,9214 wins
-98.0% vs Diegel at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Diegel | 0 | 0 | 25 | 57 | 144 | 493 |
| 🇰🇷 Ryu | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Diegel81.4
Ryu81.2
FAQ
Where does Ryu beat Diegel?
Ryu scores higher on statistics, longevity. Diegel leads on peak, dominance.
How is the Diegel vs Ryu score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Diegel: 81.4, Ryu: 81.2.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Diegel vs Ryu. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.