Who is better, Thompson or Åberg?
Lexi Thompson leads with a GOAT score of 66.4 against 57.6 for Ludvig Åberg — a gap of 8.8 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Lexi Thompson above Ludvig Åberg: 66.4 vs 57.6. Lexi Thompson leads on Longevity, Peak, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Thompson wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Åberg wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/lexi-thompson-vs-ludvig-aberg
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Thompson leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Thompson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 9 |
| 🇸🇪 Åberg | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 8 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ThompsonActive | ÅbergActive |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 1 | — |
| LPGA Tour wins | 11 | — |
| Solheim Cup appearances | 6 | — |
| Career top-10 finishes | 100 | — |
| Ladies European Tour wins | 2 | — |
| PGA Tour wins | — | 2 |
| DP World Tour wins | — | 1 |
| Ryder Cup appearances | — | 1 |
| Major runner-up finishes | — | 1 |
| Best world ranking | — | 4 |
| PGA Tour top-10 finishes | — | 25 |
| Dominance w25% | 62 | 58 |
| Peak w20% | 74 | 68 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 42 |
| Honours w20% | 58 | 56 |
| Statistics w15% | 70 | 66 |
Lexi Thompson leads with a GOAT score of 66.4 against 57.6 for Ludvig Åberg — a gap of 8.8 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Åberg does not lead any of the five categories; Thompson is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Thompson: 66.4, Åberg: 57.6.
Make your case for Thompson vs Åberg. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.