Who is better, Li or Qiao?
Li Jie leads with a GOAT score of 85.2 against 85.2 for Qiao Hong — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Li Jie and Qiao Hong level at 85.2. Li Jie leads on Longevity, Statistics. Qiao Hong leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Li wins: Longevity, Statistics
Qiao wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/li-jie-tabletennis-vs-qiao-hong
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Li leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇱 Li | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 222 | 580 |
| 🇨🇳 Qiao | 0 | 0 | 58 | 128 | 394 | 766 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | LiRetired | QiaoRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European Games gold medals | 1 | — |
| European Championship medals | 3 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 3 | — |
| Dutch titles | 8 | — |
| World Championship appearances | 8 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 2 |
| Olympic medals | — | 4 |
| World Championship titles | — | 4 |
| World Cup medals | — | 2 |
| Years at the top level | — | 12 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 84 |
Li Jie leads with a GOAT score of 85.2 against 85.2 for Qiao Hong — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Qiao scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Li leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Li: 85.2, Qiao: 85.2.
Make your case for Li vs Qiao. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.