Who is better, Li Ju or De Nutte?
Li Ju leads with a GOAT score of 81.9 against 81.9 for Sarah De Nutte — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Li Ju and Sarah De Nutte level at 81.9. Li Ju leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. Sarah De Nutte leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Li Ju wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
De Nutte wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/li-ju-vs-sarah-de-nutte
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Li Ju leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳 Li Ju | 0 | 0 | 58 | 128 | 388 | 732 |
| 🇱🇺 De Nutte | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 228 | 614 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Li JuRetired | De NutteActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| Olympic medals | 2 | — |
| World Championship titles | 3 | — |
| World Cup medals | 1 | — |
| Years at the top level | 10 | — |
| European Games medals | — | 2 |
| Luxembourg titles | — | 10 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 2 |
| European Championship appearances | — | 8 |
| World Championship appearances | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 86 |
Li Ju leads with a GOAT score of 81.9 against 81.9 for Sarah De Nutte — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
De Nutte scores higher on statistics, longevity. Li Ju leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Li Ju: 81.9, De Nutte: 81.9.
Make your case for Li Ju vs De Nutte. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.