Who is better, Zhang or Dolinar?
Lily Zhang leads with a GOAT score of 83.6 against 83.4 for Žarko Dolinar — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Lily Zhang above Žarko Dolinar: 83.6 vs 83.4. Lily Zhang leads on Longevity, Statistics. Žarko Dolinar leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Zhang wins: Longevity, Statistics
Dolinar wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/lily-zhang-vs-zarko-dolinar
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Zhang leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Zhang | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 292 | 601 |
| 🇭🇷 Dolinar | 0 | 0 | 45 | 98 | 308 | 647 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ZhangActive | DolinarRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Pan American gold medals | 2 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 4 | — |
| United States titles | 5 | — |
| World Tour medals | 2 | — |
| World Championship appearances | 7 | — |
| World doubles titles | — | 1 |
| World Championship medals | — | 5 |
| National titles | — | 6 |
| World team medals | — | 3 |
| Seasons at the top | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 84 |
Lily Zhang leads with a GOAT score of 83.6 against 83.4 for Žarko Dolinar — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Dolinar scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Zhang leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Zhang: 83.6, Dolinar: 83.4.
Make your case for Zhang vs Dolinar. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.