Who is better, Lin S. or Ekholm?
Matilda Ekholm leads with a GOAT score of 82.8 against 82.7 for Lin Shidong — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Matilda Ekholm above Lin Shidong: 82.8 vs 82.7. Matilda Ekholm leads on Longevity. Lin Shidong leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ekholm wins: Longevity
Lin S. wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/lin-shidong-vs-matilda-ekholm
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ekholm leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳 Lin S. | 0 | 0 | 62 | 142 | 330 | 330 |
| 🇸🇪 Ekholm | 0 | 0 | 45 | 94 | 261 | 533 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Lin S.Active | EkholmRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship singles titles | 1 | — |
| WTT Grand Smash titles | 3 | — |
| Weeks at world number one | 60 | — |
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Seasons on the pro tour | 4 | — |
| European Championship titles | — | 2 |
| European medals | — | 4 |
| Swedish titles | — | 9 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 2 |
| World ranking peak | — | 16 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 62 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 84 |
Matilda Ekholm leads with a GOAT score of 82.8 against 82.7 for Lin Shidong — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Lin S. scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Ekholm leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Lin S.: 82.7, Ekholm: 82.8.
Make your case for Lin S. vs Ekholm. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.