Who is better, Mangrum or Lehman?
Lloyd Mangrum leads with a GOAT score of 83.6 against 83.5 for Tom Lehman — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Mangrum vs Lehman
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Lloyd Mangrum above Tom Lehman: 83.6 vs 83.5. Lloyd Mangrum leads on Dominance, Statistics. Tom Lehman leads on Longevity, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MangrumWinner
83.6Mangrum wins: Dominance, Statistics
Lehman
83.5Lehman wins: Peak, Longevity
Candidates
Locked to GolfShareable URL · /compare/lloyd-mangrum-vs-tom-lehman
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Lloyd Mangrum
83.6
Mangrum leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Lloyd Mangrum
2. Tom Lehman
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Lloyd Mangrum5 seasons played · career day 1,825191 wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Tom Lehman5 seasons played · career day 5,4785 wins
-97.4% vs Mangrum at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Mangrum | 0 | 0 | 25 | 57 | 191 | 461 |
| 🇺🇸 Lehman | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Mangrum83.6
Lehman83.5
FAQ
Where does Lehman beat Mangrum?
Lehman scores higher on peak, longevity. Mangrum leads on dominance, statistics.
How is the Mangrum vs Lehman score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Mangrum: 83.6, Lehman: 83.5.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Mangrum vs Lehman. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.