GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Patrick vs Carnegie

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
PatrickWinner
81.3

Patrick wins: no category outright

Carnegie
81.3

Carnegie wins: no category outright

Candidates
Locked to Ice Hockey

Shareable URL · /compare/lynn-patrick-vs-herb-carnegie

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇦 Lynn Patrick
81.3

Patrick leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories. Stanley Cup winner with the Rangers and a First-Team All-Star scorer.

1. Lynn Patrick
81.3
2. Herb Carnegie
81.3

Category breakdown

Season form · Points per season

Career timeline · Points per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Points per season
1. 🇨🇦 Lynn Patrick5 seasons played · career day 1,825349 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇦 Herb Carnegie5 seasons played · career day 1,826349 points
0.0% vs Patrick at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇦 Patrick0055117349681
🇨🇦 Carnegie0055117264667

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricPatrickRetiredCarnegieRetired
Stanley Cups1
NHL goals145
NHL points335
All-Star selections2
NHL games455
League MVP awards3
Provincial league titles2
Professional seasons11
Hall of Fame inductions1
All-star selections4
Dominance w25%7878
Peak w20%8888
Longevity w20%7676
Honours w20%8282
Statistics w15%8484

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Patrick81.3
Carnegie81.3
The people
Patrick
Carnegie

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Patrick vs Carnegie. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →