Who is better, Ma Long or Polcanova?
Ma Long leads with a GOAT score of 97.3 against 84.6 for Sofia Polcanova — a gap of 12.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ma Long above Sofia Polcanova: 97.3 vs 84.6. Ma Long leads on Dominance, Honours, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ma Long wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Polcanova wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/ma-long-vs-sofia-polcanova
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ma Long leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Polcanova — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Polcanova — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | Ma LongActive | PolcanovaActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 6 | — |
| World singles titles | 3 | — |
| World Cup titles | 3 | — |
| Olympic medals | 6 | — |
| Months at world No. 1 | 64 | — |
| Grand Slam completed | 1 | — |
| European Championship titles | — | 2 |
| World Championship medals | — | 1 |
| World ranking peak | — | 6 |
| WTT titles | — | 3 |
| Austrian titles | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 99 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 99 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 99 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 97 | 86 |
Ma Long leads with a GOAT score of 97.3 against 84.6 for Sofia Polcanova — a gap of 12.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Polcanova does not lead any of the five categories; Ma Long is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ma Long: 97.3, Polcanova: 84.6.
Make your case for Ma Long vs Polcanova. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.