Who is better, Sagström or Macfarlane?
Madelene Sagström leads with a GOAT score of 75.7 against 75.7 for Willie Macfarlane — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Madelene Sagström and Willie Macfarlane level at 75.7. Madelene Sagström leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics. Willie Macfarlane leads on Peak, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Sagström wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Macfarlane wins: Peak, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/madelene-sagstrom-vs-willie-macfarlane
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Sagström leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Sagström | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 🇺🇸 Macfarlane | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 10 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SagströmActive | MacfarlaneRetired |
|---|---|---|
| LPGA Tour wins | 1 | — |
| Symetra Tour wins | 2 | — |
| Solheim Cup appearances | 3 | — |
| LPGA seasons | 10 | — |
| Career best world ranking | 27 | — |
| Major titles | — | 1 |
| PGA Tour wins | — | 7 |
| US Open top-tens | — | 5 |
| Career span in years | — | 22 |
| Metropolitan Open titles | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 68 | 64 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 68 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 78 |
Madelene Sagström leads with a GOAT score of 75.7 against 75.7 for Willie Macfarlane — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Macfarlane scores higher on peak, longevity. Sagström leads on dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Sagström: 75.7, Macfarlane: 75.7.
Make your case for Sagström vs Macfarlane. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.