Who is better, Brooks or Price?
Mark Brooks leads with a GOAT score of 78.1 against 78.0 for Nick Price — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Mark Brooks above Nick Price: 78.1 vs 78.0. Mark Brooks leads on Peak, Longevity, Statistics. Nick Price leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Brooks wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Price wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/mark-brooks-vs-nick-price
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Brooks leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Brooks | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 🇿🇼 Price | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Mark Brooks leads with a GOAT score of 78.1 against 78.0 for Nick Price — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Price scores higher on dominance, honours. Brooks leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Brooks: 78.1, Price: 78.0.
Make your case for Brooks vs Price. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.