Who is better, Calcavecchia or Johnson?
Zach Johnson leads with a GOAT score of 84.4 against 84.2 for Mark Calcavecchia — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Zach Johnson above Mark Calcavecchia: 84.4 vs 84.2. Zach Johnson leads on Honours, Dominance. Mark Calcavecchia leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Johnson wins: Dominance, Honours
Calcavecchia wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/mark-calcavecchia-vs-zach-johnson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Johnson leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Calcavecchia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 🇺🇸 Johnson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 8 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CalcavecchiaActive | JohnsonActive |
|---|---|---|
| Major championships | 1 | — |
| PGA Tour wins | 13 | 12 |
| Ryder Cup appearances | 4 | 5 |
| Champions Tour wins | 1 | — |
| Seasons on tour | 40 | — |
| Major titles | — | 2 |
| Presidents Cup appearances | — | 5 |
| Career-high world ranking | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 86 |
Zach Johnson leads with a GOAT score of 84.4 against 84.2 for Mark Calcavecchia — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Calcavecchia scores higher on statistics, longevity. Johnson leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Calcavecchia: 84.2, Johnson: 84.4.
Make your case for Calcavecchia vs Johnson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.