Who is better, Bratanov or Appelgren?
Mikael Appelgren leads with a GOAT score of 74.2 against 74.0 for Martin Bratanov — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Mikael Appelgren above Martin Bratanov: 74.2 vs 74.0. Mikael Appelgren leads on Honours, Dominance. Martin Bratanov leads on Statistics, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Appelgren wins: Dominance, Honours
Bratanov wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/martin-bratanov-vs-mikael-appelgren
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Appelgren leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇬 Bratanov | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 665 |
| 🇸🇪 Appelgren | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 31 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BratanovRetired | AppelgrenRetired |
|---|---|---|
| National titles | 8 | — |
| European Championship appearances | 8 | — |
| Olympic Games | 1 | — |
| Career highest world ranking | 60 | — |
| Professional seasons | 20 | — |
| European Championship singles titles | — | 3 |
| World team titles | — | 2 |
| World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| European team titles | — | 6 |
| World Championship medals | — | 8 |
| Years at top level | — | 19 |
| Dominance w25% | 64 | 68 |
| Peak w20% | 78 | 78 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 66 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 72 |
Mikael Appelgren leads with a GOAT score of 74.2 against 74.0 for Martin Bratanov — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Bratanov scores higher on statistics, longevity. Appelgren leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bratanov: 74.0, Appelgren: 74.2.
Make your case for Bratanov vs Appelgren. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.