Who is better, Fitzpatrick or Pettersen?
Matt Fitzpatrick leads with a GOAT score of 80.4 against 80.4 for Suzann Pettersen — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Matt Fitzpatrick and Suzann Pettersen level at 80.4. Matt Fitzpatrick leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics. Suzann Pettersen leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Fitzpatrick wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Pettersen wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/matt-fitzpatrick-vs-suzann-pettersen
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Fitzpatrick leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Fitzpatrick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 9 |
| 🇳🇴 Pettersen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FitzpatrickActive | PettersenRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 1 | 2 |
| DP World Tour wins | 8 | — |
| PGA Tour wins | 2 | — |
| Ryder Cup appearances | 3 | — |
| Career-high world ranking | 8 | 2 |
| LPGA wins | — | 15 |
| Ladies European Tour wins | — | 7 |
| Solheim Cup appearances | — | 9 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 82 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteMatt Fitzpatrick leads with a GOAT score of 80.4 against 80.4 for Suzann Pettersen — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Pettersen scores higher on longevity. Fitzpatrick leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Fitzpatrick: 80.4, Pettersen: 80.4.
Make your case for Fitzpatrick vs Pettersen. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.