Who is better, Falck or Sawettabut?
Suthasini Sawettabut leads with a GOAT score of 81.9 against 81.5 for Mattias Falck — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Suthasini Sawettabut above Mattias Falck: 81.9 vs 81.5. Suthasini Sawettabut leads on Longevity, Honours. Mattias Falck leads on Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Sawettabut wins: Longevity, Honours
Falck wins: Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/mattias-falck-vs-suthasini-sawettabut
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Sawettabut leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Falck | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 405 |
| 🇹🇭 Sawettabut | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 290 | 594 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FalckActive | SawettabutActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship medals | 2 | — |
| European Championship medals | 4 | — |
| World Tour titles | 2 | — |
| Career highest world ranking | 5 | — |
| Olympic Games | 2 | — |
| Southeast Asian Games gold medals | — | 6 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 3 |
| Asian Championship appearances | — | 6 |
| National titles | — | 8 |
| World Championship appearances | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 86 |
Suthasini Sawettabut leads with a GOAT score of 81.9 against 81.5 for Mattias Falck — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Falck scores higher on peak. Sawettabut leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Falck: 81.5, Sawettabut: 81.9.
Make your case for Falck vs Sawettabut. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.