Who is better, Maze or Gionis?
Panagiotis Gionis leads with a GOAT score of 79.6 against 79.4 for Michael Maze — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Panagiotis Gionis above Michael Maze: 79.6 vs 79.4. Panagiotis Gionis leads on Longevity, Statistics. Michael Maze leads on Peak, Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Gionis wins: Longevity, Statistics
Maze wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/michael-maze-vs-panagiotis-gionis-tt
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Gionis leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇰 Maze | 0 | 0 | 50 | 110 | 352 | 692 |
| 🇬🇷 Gionis | 0 | 0 | 44 | 91 | 247 | 491 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MazeRetired | GionisActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| European titles | 1 | — |
| World Championship medals | 1 | — |
| Career high world ranking | 8 | — |
| Years at the top level | 18 | — |
| European Championship medals | — | 3 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 4 |
| Europe Top 16 medals | — | 2 |
| Career world ranking best | — | 13 |
| National titles | — | 12 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 90 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 80 |
Panagiotis Gionis leads with a GOAT score of 79.6 against 79.4 for Michael Maze — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Maze scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Gionis leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Maze: 79.4, Gionis: 79.6.
Make your case for Maze vs Gionis. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.