GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Maze vs Wang Liqin

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MazeWinner
79.4

Maze wins: Peak

Wang Liqin
79.2

Wang Liqin wins: Dominance

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/michael-maze-vs-wang-liqin

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇩🇰 Michael Maze
79.4

Maze leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Olympic doubles bronze medallist in 2004 and European singles champion in 2009.

1. Michael Maze
79.4
2. Wang Liqin
79.2

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇩🇰 Michael Maze5 seasons played · career day 1,825352 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇳 Wang Liqin5 seasons played · career day 3,65125 titles
-92.9% vs Maze at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇩🇰 Maze0050110352692
🇨🇳 Wang Liqin0000020

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricMazeRetiredWang LiqinRetired
Olympic medals1
European titles1
World Championship medals1
Career high world ranking8
Years at the top level18
World Championship singles titles3
World Cup titles1
Olympic golds1
World team titles7
Months at No. 125
ITTF Tour titles21
Dominance w25%7478
Peak w20%8882
Longevity w20%7878
Honours w20%8080
Statistics w15%7878

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Maze79.4
Wang Liqin79.2
The people
Maze
Wang Liqin

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Maze vs Wang Liqin. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →