Who is better, Appelgren or Walther?
Ricardo Walther leads with a GOAT score of 74.3 against 74.2 for Mikael Appelgren — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ricardo Walther above Mikael Appelgren: 74.3 vs 74.2. Ricardo Walther leads on Statistics, Honours. Mikael Appelgren leads on Dominance, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Walther wins: Honours, Statistics
Appelgren wins: Dominance, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/mikael-appelgren-vs-ricardo-walther-tt
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Walther leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Appelgren | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 31 |
| 🇩🇪 Walther | 0 | 0 | 42 | 88 | 250 | 522 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AppelgrenRetired | WaltherActive |
|---|---|---|
| European Championship singles titles | 3 | — |
| World team titles | 2 | — |
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| European team titles | 6 | 2 |
| World Championship medals | 8 | — |
| Years at top level | 19 | — |
| European Games medals | — | 1 |
| Career world ranking best | — | 35 |
| Bundesliga seasons | — | 16 |
| National medals | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 68 | 66 |
| Peak w20% | 78 | 78 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 72 | 76 |
Ricardo Walther leads with a GOAT score of 74.3 against 74.2 for Mikael Appelgren — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Appelgren scores higher on dominance, longevity. Walther leads on honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Appelgren: 74.2, Walther: 74.3.
Make your case for Appelgren vs Walther. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.