GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Ito vs Harimoto

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ItoWinner
67.3

Ito wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics

Harimoto
62.5

Harimoto wins: no category outright

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/mima-ito-vs-tomokazu-harimoto

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇯🇵 Mima Ito
67.3

Ito leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories. Olympic mixed doubles champion in Tokyo and a three-medal Games for Japan.

1. Mima Ito
67.3
2. Tomokazu Harimoto
62.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇯🇵 Mima Ito5 seasons played · career day 2,19014 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇯🇵 Tomokazu Harimoto5 seasons played · career day 2,1919 titles
-35.7% vs Ito at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇯🇵 Ito00021122
🇯🇵 Harimoto0002714

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricItoActiveHarimotoActive
Olympic golds1
Olympic medals41
World Tour titles88
World Championship medals33
Best world ranking23
Asian Championship medals4
Dominance w25%6662
Peak w20%7874
Longevity w20%5652
Honours w20%6658
Statistics w15%7268

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Ito67.3
Harimoto62.5
The people
Ito
Harimoto

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Ito vs Harimoto. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →