GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Hasegawa vs Čordaš

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ČordašWinner
82.4

Čordaš wins: Longevity, Statistics

Hasegawa
82.0

Hasegawa wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/nobuhiko-hasegawa-vs-zlatko-cordas

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇭🇷 Zlatko Čordaš
82.4

Čordaš leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. World Championship medallist for Yugoslavia in the 1970s.

1. Zlatko Čordaš
82.4
2. Nobuhiko Hasegawa
82.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇯🇵 Nobuhiko Hasegawa5 seasons played · career day 1,825388 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇭🇷 Zlatko Čordaš5 seasons played · career day 1,826336 titles
-13.4% vs Hasegawa at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇯🇵 Hasegawa0058126388702
🇭🇷 Čordaš0050109252666

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricHasegawaRetiredČordašRetired
World Championship singles titles1
World team titles2
World Championship medals52
Asian Championship titles2
Years at the top level11
European Championship medals2
Yugoslav titles4
World Championship appearances5
Swaythling Cup appearances5
Dominance w25%8278
Peak w20%9288
Longevity w20%7080
Honours w20%8482
Statistics w15%8286

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Čordaš82.4
Hasegawa82.0
The people
Hasegawa
Čordaš

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Hasegawa vs Čordaš. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →