Who is better, Hasegawa or Čordaš?
Zlatko Čordaš leads with a GOAT score of 82.4 against 82.0 for Nobuhiko Hasegawa — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Zlatko Čordaš above Nobuhiko Hasegawa: 82.4 vs 82.0. Zlatko Čordaš leads on Longevity, Statistics. Nobuhiko Hasegawa leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Čordaš wins: Longevity, Statistics
Hasegawa wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/nobuhiko-hasegawa-vs-zlatko-cordas
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Čordaš leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇯🇵 Hasegawa | 0 | 0 | 58 | 126 | 388 | 702 |
| 🇭🇷 Čordaš | 0 | 0 | 50 | 109 | 252 | 666 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HasegawaRetired | ČordašRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship singles titles | 1 | — |
| World team titles | 2 | — |
| World Championship medals | 5 | 2 |
| Asian Championship titles | 2 | — |
| Years at the top level | 11 | — |
| European Championship medals | — | 2 |
| Yugoslav titles | — | 4 |
| World Championship appearances | — | 5 |
| Swaythling Cup appearances | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 86 |
Zlatko Čordaš leads with a GOAT score of 82.4 against 82.0 for Nobuhiko Hasegawa — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hasegawa scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Čordaš leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hasegawa: 82.0, Čordaš: 82.4.
Make your case for Hasegawa vs Čordaš. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.