Who is better, Morris or De Vicenzo?
Roberto De Vicenzo leads with a GOAT score of 89.2 against 89.1 for Old Tom Morris — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Roberto De Vicenzo above Old Tom Morris: 89.2 vs 89.1. Roberto De Vicenzo leads on Statistics, Longevity. Old Tom Morris leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →De Vicenzo wins: Longevity, Statistics
Morris wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/old-tom-morris-vs-roberto-de-vicenzo
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
De Vicenzo leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Morris | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 🇦🇷 De Vicenzo | 0 | 0 | 30 | 62 | 172 | 349 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MorrisRetired | De VicenzoRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Open Championships | 4 | 1 |
| Oldest Open champion age | 46 | — |
| Open appearances | 36 | — |
| Courses designed | 75 | — |
| Career span in years | 45 | — |
| Professional wins worldwide | — | 230 |
| Argentine Open titles | — | 9 |
| World Cup team titles | — | 1 |
| Seasons played | — | 48 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 96 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 92 |
Roberto De Vicenzo leads with a GOAT score of 89.2 against 89.1 for Old Tom Morris — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Morris scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. De Vicenzo leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Morris: 89.1, De Vicenzo: 89.2.
Make your case for Morris vs De Vicenzo. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.