Who is better, Blecha or Wang Nan?
Oldřich Blecha leads with a GOAT score of 81.2 against 80.8 for Wang Nan — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Oldřich Blecha above Wang Nan: 81.2 vs 80.8. Oldřich Blecha leads on Longevity, Statistics, Peak. Wang Nan leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Blecha wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Wang Nan wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/oldrich-blecha-vs-wang-nan
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Blecha leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇿 Blecha | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 334 | 662 |
| 🇨🇳 Wang Nan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 49 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BlechaRetired | Wang NanRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship medals | 2 | — |
| Czechoslovak titles | 3 | — |
| European Championship appearances | 3 | — |
| World Championship appearances | 5 | — |
| Swaythling Cup appearances | 5 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 4 |
| World Championship titles | — | 15 |
| World Cup singles titles | — | 4 |
| World team titles | — | 6 |
| Months at No. 1 | — | 66 |
| ITTF Tour titles | — | 30 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 80 |
Oldřich Blecha leads with a GOAT score of 81.2 against 80.8 for Wang Nan — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Wang Nan scores higher on dominance, honours. Blecha leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Blecha: 81.2, Wang Nan: 80.8.
Make your case for Blecha vs Wang Nan. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.