Who is better, Assar or Sun Yingsha?
Omar Assar leads with a GOAT score of 79.1 against 79.1 for Sun Yingsha — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Omar Assar and Sun Yingsha level at 79.1. Omar Assar leads on Longevity. Sun Yingsha leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Assar wins: Longevity
Sun Yingsha wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/omar-assar-tt-vs-sun-yingsha
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Assar leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇪🇬 Assar | 0 | 0 | 46 | 96 | 267 | 548 |
| 🇨🇳 Sun Yingsha | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 40 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AssarActive | Sun YingshaActive |
|---|---|---|
| African Championship titles | 3 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 4 | — |
| ITTF Contender titles | 2 | — |
| Career world ranking best | 17 | — |
| All-Africa Games golds | 2 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 3 |
| World Championship singles titles | — | 2 |
| World Cup titles | — | 3 |
| World team titles | — | 3 |
| Months at No. 1 | — | 45 |
| WTT titles | — | 25 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 83 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 66 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 82 |
Omar Assar leads with a GOAT score of 79.1 against 79.1 for Sun Yingsha — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Sun Yingsha scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Assar leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Assar: 79.1, Sun Yingsha: 79.1.
Make your case for Assar vs Sun Yingsha. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.