Who is better, Franziska or Gauzy?
Patrick Franziska leads with a GOAT score of 81.1 against 80.8 for Simon Gauzy — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Patrick Franziska above Simon Gauzy: 81.1 vs 80.8. Patrick Franziska leads on Statistics, Longevity, Peak. Simon Gauzy leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Franziska wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Gauzy wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/patrick-franziska-vs-simon-gauzy-tt
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Franziska leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Franziska | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 25 |
| 🇫🇷 Gauzy | 0 | 0 | 48 | 100 | 280 | 580 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FranziskaActive | GauzyActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 2 | — |
| European team titles | 4 | 1 |
| World team medals | 3 | — |
| European doubles titles | 2 | — |
| Career-high ranking | 9 | — |
| Olympic team medals | — | 1 |
| European singles medals | — | 1 |
| Career world ranking best | — | 10 |
| World Championship team medals | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 85 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 80 |
Patrick Franziska leads with a GOAT score of 81.1 against 80.8 for Simon Gauzy — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Gauzy scores higher on dominance, honours. Franziska leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Franziska: 81.1, Gauzy: 80.8.
Make your case for Franziska vs Gauzy. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.