Who is better, Azinger or Pettersen?
Suzann Pettersen leads with a GOAT score of 80.4 against 80.2 for Paul Azinger — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Suzann Pettersen above Paul Azinger: 80.4 vs 80.2. Suzann Pettersen leads on Longevity, Honours, Statistics. Paul Azinger leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Pettersen wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Azinger wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/paul-azinger-vs-suzann-pettersen
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Pettersen leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Azinger | 0 | 0 | 25 | 56 | 185 | 438 |
| 🇳🇴 Pettersen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AzingerRetired | PettersenRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 1 | 2 |
| PGA Tour wins | 12 | — |
| Ryder Cup appearances | 4 | — |
| PGA Player of the Year awards | 1 | — |
| Top-10 major finishes | 15 | — |
| LPGA wins | — | 15 |
| Ladies European Tour wins | — | 7 |
| Solheim Cup appearances | — | 9 |
| Career-high world ranking | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 82 |
Suzann Pettersen leads with a GOAT score of 80.4 against 80.2 for Paul Azinger — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Azinger scores higher on peak, dominance. Pettersen leads on honours, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Azinger: 80.2, Pettersen: 80.4.
Make your case for Azinger vs Pettersen. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.