Who is better, Edberg or MacIntyre?
Robert MacIntyre leads with a GOAT score of 74.4 against 74.1 for Pelle Edberg — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Robert MacIntyre above Pelle Edberg: 74.4 vs 74.1. Robert MacIntyre leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. Pelle Edberg leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →MacIntyre wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Edberg wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/pelle-edberg-vs-robert-macintyre
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
MacIntyre leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Edberg | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,060 | 1,820 |
| 🇬🇧 MacIntyre | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | EdbergRetired | MacIntyreActive |
|---|---|---|
| European Tour wins | 1 | — |
| Challenge Tour wins | 3 | — |
| Highest world ranking | 120 | — |
| European Tour starts | 200 | — |
| Professional years | 18 | — |
| PGA Tour wins | — | 2 |
| DP World Tour wins | — | 3 |
| Ryder Cup appearances | — | 2 |
| Career-high world ranking | — | 11 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 62 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 62 |
| Honours w20% | 62 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 80 |
Robert MacIntyre leads with a GOAT score of 74.4 against 74.1 for Pelle Edberg — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Edberg scores higher on statistics, longevity. MacIntyre leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Edberg: 74.1, MacIntyre: 74.4.
Make your case for Edberg vs MacIntyre. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.