Who is better, Karlsson or Harimoto?
Peter Karlsson leads with a GOAT score of 70.1 against 62.5 for Tomokazu Harimoto — a gap of 7.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Peter Karlsson above Tomokazu Harimoto: 70.1 vs 62.5. Peter Karlsson leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Karlsson wins: Longevity, Honours
Harimoto wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/peter-karlsson-vs-tomokazu-harimoto
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Karlsson leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Karlsson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
| 🇯🇵 Harimoto | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 14 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KarlssonRetired | HarimotoActive |
|---|---|---|
| European Championship singles titles | 1 | — |
| World team titles | 2 | — |
| European team titles | 4 | — |
| World Championship medals | 5 | 3 |
| Olympic appearances | 4 | — |
| Years at top level | 25 | — |
| World Tour titles | — | 8 |
| Olympic medals | — | 1 |
| Best world ranking | — | 3 |
| Asian Championship medals | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 62 | 62 |
| Peak w20% | 74 | 74 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 52 |
| Honours w20% | 66 | 58 |
| Statistics w15% | 68 | 68 |
Peter Karlsson leads with a GOAT score of 70.1 against 62.5 for Tomokazu Harimoto — a gap of 7.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Harimoto does not lead any of the five categories; Karlsson is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Karlsson: 70.1, Harimoto: 62.5.
Make your case for Karlsson vs Harimoto. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.