Who is better, Karlsson or Wang M.?
Wang Manyu leads with a GOAT score of 71.8 against 70.1 for Peter Karlsson — a gap of 1.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Wang Manyu above Peter Karlsson: 71.8 vs 70.1. Wang Manyu leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Peter Karlsson leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Wang M. wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Karlsson wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/peter-karlsson-vs-wang-manyu
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Wang M. leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Karlsson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
| 🇨🇳 Wang M. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 20 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KarlssonRetired | Wang M.Active |
|---|---|---|
| European Championship singles titles | 1 | — |
| World team titles | 2 | — |
| European team titles | 4 | — |
| World Championship medals | 5 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 4 | — |
| Years at top level | 25 | — |
| World titles | — | 1 |
| Olympic golds | — | 2 |
| World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| World Tour titles | — | 10 |
| Best world ranking | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 62 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 74 | 82 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 58 |
| Honours w20% | 66 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 68 | 76 |
Wang Manyu leads with a GOAT score of 71.8 against 70.1 for Peter Karlsson — a gap of 1.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Karlsson scores higher on longevity. Wang M. leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Karlsson: 70.1, Wang M.: 71.8.
Make your case for Karlsson vs Wang M.. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.