Who is better, Robinot or Samsonov?
Quentin Robinot leads with a GOAT score of 74.8 against 74.5 for Vladimir Samsonov — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Quentin Robinot above Vladimir Samsonov: 74.8 vs 74.5. Quentin Robinot leads on Honours, Statistics, Dominance. Vladimir Samsonov leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Robinot wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Samsonov wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/quentin-robinot-tt-vs-samsonov
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Robinot leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇷 Robinot | 0 | 0 | 42 | 88 | 254 | 538 |
| 🇧🇾 Samsonov | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 23 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | RobinotActive | SamsonovRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European team titles | 1 | — |
| World Championship team medals | 1 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 2 | 6 |
| Career world ranking best | 43 | — |
| National titles | 2 | — |
| World Cup titles | — | 3 |
| European Championship singles titles | — | 3 |
| World Championship medals | — | 2 |
| Best world ranking | — | 1 |
| Years at top level | — | 30 |
| Dominance w25% | 68 | 66 |
| Peak w20% | 78 | 78 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 90 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 68 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 72 |
Quentin Robinot leads with a GOAT score of 74.8 against 74.5 for Vladimir Samsonov — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Samsonov scores higher on longevity. Robinot leads on dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Robinot: 74.8, Samsonov: 74.5.
Make your case for Robinot vs Samsonov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.