Who is better, Goosen or Anderson?
Retief Goosen leads with a GOAT score of 85.6 against 85.5 for Willie Anderson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Retief Goosen above Willie Anderson: 85.6 vs 85.5. Retief Goosen leads on Longevity, Statistics. Willie Anderson leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Goosen wins: Longevity, Statistics
Anderson wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/retief-goosen-vs-willie-anderson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Goosen leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇿🇦 Goosen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 🏴 Anderson | 0 | 0 | 40 | 88 | 280 | 711 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GoosenActive | AndersonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 2 | — |
| European Tour wins | 14 | — |
| PGA Tour wins | 7 | — |
| Order of Merit titles | 2 | — |
| Presidents Cup appearances | 5 | — |
| US Open titles | — | 4 |
| Consecutive US Open titles | — | 3 |
| Western Open titles | — | 4 |
| Professional wins | — | 11 |
| Top-5 US Open finishes | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 92 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 66 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 86 |
Retief Goosen leads with a GOAT score of 85.6 against 85.5 for Willie Anderson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Anderson scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Goosen leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Goosen: 85.6, Anderson: 85.5.
Make your case for Goosen vs Anderson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.